A Sharp plant north of Tokyo. The revised deal terms came as a result of the extra time Foxconn had to conduct due diligence.Photo: Reiji Murai/Reuters
The boards of Sharp Corp. and Foxconn Technology Group will meet separately on Wednesday to discuss a revised takeover package that could initially shave at least ¥245 billion, or $2.16 billion, off the nearly $6 billion price tag for troubled electronics maker Sharp, people familiar with the matter said.
Under the new terms, which people familiar with the matter said are still under negotiation and could change, Japan-based Sharp...
The boards of Sharp Corp. and Foxconn Technology Group will meet separately on Wednesday to discuss a revised takeover package that could initially shave at least ¥245 billion, or $2.16 billion, off the nearly $6 billion price tag for troubled electronics maker Sharp, people familiar with the matter said.
Under the new terms, which people familiar with the matter said are still under negotiation and could change, Japan-based Sharp would issue new shares to Foxconn in exchange for an infusion of ¥389 billion for about a two-thirds stake, down from Foxconn’s original offer of ¥489 billion.
To make up for the shortfall, the people said Sharp’s two main lenders, Mizuho Bank and Bank of Tokyo-Mitsubishi UFJ, would offer a credit line of ¥300 billion to Sharp, which makes everything from televisions to solar panels to screens for Apple Inc.’s iPhones.
The two banks, which have held ¥200 billion of preferred Sharp shares since they bailed out the company last year, would let Foxconn delay buying those shares for about three years, the people said.
Taiwan’s Foxconn, known formally as Hon Hai Precision Industry Co. , originally offered to buy half the preferred shares for ¥100 billion.
The people said a side agreement for Foxconn to pay ¥45 billion for the land beneath Sharp’s advanced display panel factory in Sakai, Japan, was canceled, according to the revised terms. The people said discussions with Sharp’s two main lenders over revised terms for Sharp’s ¥500 billion in bank debt—such as lowering interest rates on the loans and lengthening the payback schedule—are continuing.
Foxconn and Sharp are tentatively planning to announce an agreement at a news conference that could come as early as Saturday, people familiar with the matter said.
Foxconn said on Tuesday that trading of its shares on the Taiwan Stock Exchange would be suspended Wednesday because of a “major announcement.” A Sharp spokesman said it is working with Foxconn to reach an agreement as soon as possible.
Some Sharp board members, including Chief Executive Kozo Takahashi, are expected to step down once the deal is approved by Sharp shareholders in June, one of the people said.
On Monday, Sharp said that Tetsuo Onishi, an executive vice president in charge of restructuring its display business, would step down Thursday.
People familiar with the matter said the revised terms came as a result of the extra time Foxconn had to conduct due diligence. Over the past month, Foxconn has sent hundreds of people to take stock of everything from Sharp’s information-technology infrastructure to its inventories, two of the people said, adding that the teams have uncovered issues related to factory overcapacity and China sales that helped to convince Sharp’s lenders to agree to revised terms.
Sharp declined Tuesday to comment on details of the negotiations, including what Foxconn has discovered through the due diligence process.
For its fiscal year ending this month, Sharp is expected to report a net loss of ¥200 billion, people familiar with the matter said, due to weaker sales of display panels and a one-time loss. In its previous fiscal year, Sharp posted a loss of ¥222 billion.
Sharp’s board initially approved a package from Foxconn to buy the struggling Japanese company for ¥659 billion in late February. However, Foxconn left Sharp standing at the altar after the Taiwanese company received a document from Sharp outlining an additional ¥350 billion of contingent liabilities—or potential future financial risks—that hadn’t previously been disclosed, according to people familiar with the matter.
—Atsuko Fukase in Tokyo and Eva Dou in Beijing contributed to this article.
Write to Wayne Ma at wayne.ma@wsj.com and Takashi Mochizuki at takashi.mochizuki@wsj.com