Style

Dino Brugioni’s bird’s-eye view of Cuban missile crisis

By Dan Zak

October 18, 2012 at 2:30 PM

Dino A. Brugioni, now 90 and living in Fredericksburg, at his desk during his days at the CIA. Brugioni was the CIA photo expert who first saw the Russian missile installations in Cuba, launching the Cuban missile crisis 50 years ago this month. (Eva Russo/for The Washington Post)
Analysts sought to identify likely storage sites for Soviet nuclear warheads within Cuba, as depicted in this undated image. The storage site was near a missile launch site that was under construction when the image was taken. (National Geospatial-Intelligence Agency)
Another undated image shows bunkers for nuclear warheads under construction at the MRBM and IRBM sites. Prefabricated concrete materials were brought from Russia. (U.S. Air Force)
Analysts at the National Photographic Interpretation Center used their expertise in nuclear missiles and launch platforms to determine the radius of the threat posed by the missiles in Cuba. This map depicts the reach of the Soviets medium-range ballistic missiles, then newly installed in Cuba, and the threat they presented to the United States and other nations in the Western Hemisphere during the Cuban missile crisis. (National Geospatial-Intelligence Agency)
A team of four National Photographic Interpretation Center analysts including Vincent DiRenzo, Joe Sullivan, Jim Holmes and Dick Reninger did the detailed legwork that formed the basis for the daily assessments of the imagery captured by U.S. reconnaissance aircraft over Cuba. Their analysis tipped President Kennedy to the Soviet Unions true intentions and informed his decision-making throughout the crisis. (National Geospatial-Intelligence Agency)
President John F. Kennedy meets with Soviet Foreign Minister Andrei Gromyko, center, at the White House on Oct. 18, 1962. At left is Anatoly Dobrynin, the Soviet ambassador to the United States. (Harvey Georges/Associated Press)
A Pentagon image shows a Soviet missile similar to the AS-1 Kennel air-to-surface missile carried by Soviet bombers and intended for anti-shipping strikes on invading forces. (Defense Department)
An undated image shows how the Soviets continued their effort to build their military forces within Cuba as negotiations between President John F. Kennedy and Soviet Premier Nikita Khrushchev wore on. This photo showed Soviet technicians assembling Ilyushin-28 bombers that had been shipped in parts to Cuba. (National Geospatial-Intelligence Agency)
An undated image of Mariel, a port on the northwestern coast of Cuba that served as a major port of entry for Soviet goods and as a Cuban naval base. Analysts at the National Photographic Interpretation Center monitored imagery of the port to gauge whether the Soviets were bringing in more materiel. The Soviets attempted to send four diesel submarines to Cuba during the crisis. Intelligence-gathering by the NPIC and other agencies resulted in the Navy successfully forcing three subs to the surface before turning them around, with the fourth turning back in mid-journey, still submerged. (National Geospatial-Intelligence Agency)
An aerial view shows a Soviet ship carrying eight canvas-covered missiles and transporters, visible on decks, as it steams away from Cuba on Nov. 7, 1962. (Associated Press)
An undated image shows freighters delivering oxidizer and rocket fuel to Cuba on what would be the final day of the crisis. (National Geospatial-Intelligence Agency)
President Kennedy signs the order imposing a naval blockade on Cuba on Oct. 24, 1962. On Oct. 22, Kennedy informed the American people of the presence of missile sites in Cuba. Tensions mounted, and the world wondered whether there could be a peaceful resolution to the crisis. It came on Nov. 20, 1962, when Russian bombers left Cuba and Kennedy lifted the naval blockade. (Agence France-Presse via Getty Images)
At his home in Fredericksburg, Dino A. Brugioni, 90, looks at declassified documents and photographs from his days in the CIA. Brugioni, a former senior official at the CIA's National Photographic Interpretation Center, was the CIA photo expert who first saw Soviet missile installations in Cuba in 1962, a discovery that led to the Cuban missile crisis. (Eva Russo/For The Washington Post)
Dino A. Brugioni has this scrapbook of declassified documents and photographs from his days at the CIA. Brugioni, a former senior official at the CIA's National Photographic Interpretation Center, was the CIA photo expert who first saw Soviet missile installations in Cuba. (Eva Russo/For The Washington Post)
Photo Gallery: A first look at the Cuban missile crisis

Fifty years ago Monday afternoon, Dino A. Brugioni was peering through a microstereoscope at black-and-white aerial photographs of Cuba. Outside his grimy, nondescript office building at Fifth and K streets NW, it was an ideal autumn day. The leaves had begun to turn. Washington was debating the merits of the Redskins, who had tied the St. Louis Cardinals on the road the day before. And about 1,000 nautical miles south, the Soviets were readying medium-range ballistic missiles in the Sierra del Rosario, west-southwest of Havana. Washington was in range.

In the National Photographic Interpretation Center, Brugioni, his fellow photo interpreter Vincent DiRenzo and the center’s silver-haired director, Arthur C. Lundahl, absorbed the weight of the evidence before them. The room was still.

“I think I know what you guys think they are,” Lundahl said finally, referring to the small alien shapes in the photos, “and if I think they are the same thing and we both are right, we are sitting on the biggest story of our time.”

On Tuesday — 50 years and one day later — Brugioni, 90, sits at the kitchen table in his ranch-style home in Hartwood, Va., northwest of Fredericksburg. Before him, on the table, is a stack of enlarged photos, some of which he used to make three 20-by-22-inch briefing boards for President John F. Kennedy. The boards illustrated, simply and definitely, that the Soviets were positioning offensive missiles in Cuba.

And off went the Cuban missile crisis.

Outside Brugioni’s kitchen window, blue jays zip between orange-leafed trees on his grassy acreage. Fifty years ago could be yesterday.

“I had a cot next to my desk,” Brugioni says, a hint of his native Missouri in his strong voice. “And I was answering phones, but I also got down on my knees and prayed.”

Bombing missions

His journey to that moment began decades earlier at a dairy in Jefferson City, Mo., where he worked for 10 cents an hour and saved $8 to buy his first camera. His grandfather had emigrated from Italy to work in coal mines; his father followed suit but wanted his sons to pursue above-ground careers. Brugioni went to college and enlisted in the Army Air Corps when World War II started. He flew 66 bombing missions and about 15 reconnaissance missions all across Europe, lying on his stomach in a B-25 at 5,000 feet, snapping photos of enemy troops.

“Only in America could an Italian coal miner’s son be given that kind of a privilege,” he says.

After the war, Brugioni couriered for the Tennessee Valley Authority to pay his way toward an international economics degree at George Washington University. He met his wife, Theresa, while on an errand at the Library of Congress, where she worked in the photo-duplication department. The first time he saw her, she was decorating an office Christmas tree. Her legs were at eye level, as he tells it, and that was that.

Brugioni joined the intelligence community in 1948, became an expert on Soviet industrial installations and, in 1955, a founding member of what would become the National Photographic Interpretation Center, which provided the intelligence community with visual analyses of foreign military installations, among other scenes. A sign fixed to the wall of the Fifth-and-K office outlined the mission in this new age of nuclear armament and electronic innovation: “Anticipate all problems prior to their occurrence.”

Under President Dwight D. Eisenhower, using aerial photography gathered by the new U-2 aircraft, the NPIC team debunked the notion that the Soviet Union had outpaced the United States in bomber production. Brugioni and fellow interpreters divined crucial information from the abstract geometry of photos taken from high altitudes (for example, roads with wider turns indicated the transport of longer missiles).

“Everything that man does on the face of the Earth creates a pattern,” Brugioni says, sitting at his kitchen table with a visitor. “Let me give you an example. Let me try you out as a photo interpreter. You’re photographing every Russian secret installation every third day, around the clock. We’re looking at a group of buildings, and we want to know which one is the headquarters. You determine it in the winter. How?”

The amount of footsteps in the snow?

“You’re getting close,” he says. “The headquarters is the first building to be cleared of snow.”

‘A holy miracle’

When U-2s started photographing Soviet activity in Cuba, NPIC’s skill set proved to be “a holy miracle,” as intelligence pioneer Sherman Kent called the data gathered from the flights. Fifty years ago this week, interpreters were scouring photos and extracting intelligence that signaled the potential for nuclear armageddon. Every higher-ranked official up to Kennedy asked the team, “Are you sure?”

They were. Daily photo reconnaissance and interpretation — accomplished in tense, 12-hour shifts comparing thousands of feet of film — steered the crisis during its 13 dire days. The teamwork at NPIC forced and empowered U.S. officials to make crucial decisions that readied the nation for (and perhaps spared it from) catastrophe. The darkest day was Oct. 27, 1962, when negotiations between Kennedy and Soviet leader Nikita Khrushchev were at a boiling point, when analysts determined that the missile sites were fully operational, when the military had elevated its readiness to DEFCON 2.

Brugioni called his wife — who always left dinner out for him, who never complained about her husband’s long hours of secret work — to tell her to be ready to jump in the car and head for Missouri.

The next morning, Khrushchev agreed to dismantle the missiles in Cuba in exchange for Kennedy’s pledge to remove U.S. missiles from Turkey. The world exhaled. Brugioni retired from NPIC in 1981, wrote an account of the crisis titled “Eyeball to Eyeball” in 1990, was a CIA consultant until 1998 and published articles on the intelligence and environmental uses of aerial and spatial imagery (which, in recent years, has been used to guide the response to natural disasters and to help verify the location of Osama bin Laden’s residence).

Sometimes the problems of the world — and the solutions to them — are visible only by studying patterns from high above.

‘Insight of an artist’

Brugioni has the ability “to explain complicated technical procedures to ordinary people and to policy makers,” says Michael Dobbs, a former Washington Post reporter and author of three books on the Cold War. “The first pictures were taken at 70,000 feet and were rather obscure. They meant something to the intelligence people but not the policy maker necessarily. . . . To be a good interpreter, you need to be an expert but you also need to have flashes of insight — the insight of an artist. . . . They’d look for soccer fields and that would be the sign of a Soviet military camp, whereas a baseball diamond would be sign of a Cuban military camp. It’s more than just measuring missiles. It’s having an insight into the cultures of these countries.”

On Monday, Brugioni and DiRenzo met with hundreds of their modern-day counterparts at the National Geospatial-Intelligence Agency, which bestowed the men with plaques thanking them for helping to “counteract a formidable threat to our country.” Brugioni, speaking to a spellbound audience of analysts, emphasized the humanity at the core of their work. They are watching — godlike, from high above and far away — over volatile and uncertain terrain, with lives at stake.

“I kept after the people yesterday, saying, ‘Don’t forget the troops,’ ” Brugioni says. “Every time you’re looking at that photography, ask, ‘Am I seeing something that can help the troops?’ . . . When we were working [in the ’60s], we never thought that today we could just get Google maps and look down at some of the most highly classified plants in Russia or China. It’s amazing. . . . [Analysts] go into a palace where they have all this kind of equipment and all this sophistication, and I had been there before, and I’m always concerned. . . . If there’s troops there, be concerned about them.”

The plaque sits in a box on a coffee table in the next room, near a copy of the cushioned oak rocking chair Kennedy kept in the Oval Office. Thursday night and Sunday at noon, Brugioni appears in a documentary about the crisis airing on the Military Channel. On Friday evening, at the Steven F. Udvar-Hazy Center in Chantilly, he will give a lecture on photography’s role in the half-century-old nuclear crisis, even as the planet chatters about a new potential crisis between Iran and Israel.

“We had said we were going to the brink,” Brugioni says of 50-year-old lessons. “That was a policy. Brinksmanship.”

He pauses.

“And we got to the brink, and we didn’t know what the hell to do.”

Outside his kitchen window, the leaves are turning. Washington is again debating the merits of the Redskins, who have swung this season between disappointment and triumph.

Everything man does on the face of the Earth creates a pattern, as Brugioni says.

In his living room sits a black-and-white photo of Dino and Theresa’s wedding. They were married 55 years and had two children, who between them had six of their own. One of Brugioni’s grandsons is an Army surgeon stationed at Tripler Army Medical Center in Honolulu. He’s expected to deploy to Afghanistan next year.


Dan Zak is a feature writer. He joined the Post in 2005.

Outbrain