A building is a project. It starts with an idea. It needs an architect, a builder, a time line, a due date, a completion. There is a beginning and an end. A website isn’t a project, isn’t a building. A website has no end, no final completion. A website is a garden.
For a garden, you need an idea as well, for sure. And often, there is a clear beginning, if only getting rid of the rubbish of the previous owner. And sometimes, there is an architect designing the landscape, laying out the garden plan. Moreover, sometimes there is a deadline and completion date as well. You might want the garden to be ready for its first party with family, friends or neighbours.
Summary
A website isn’t a building. A website is a garden. Buildings are projects, with architects, plans, builders, a deadline. Gardens need constant attention, weeding and pruning, and observing and testing what works and what doesn’t.
But that is where the comparison ends. A garden is work in progress, constantly and always. More garden similarities? Take these:
A building is a project , with a beginning and an end. Sometimes, you expand the building or renovate. These actions again are projects. Lots of ICT projects are buildings. Begin, end, and when it’s not enough: another new project.
Websites don’t function like projects. Websites can’t be built for five years, nor for three. Replacing an old website with an all new one isn’t the way to improve it. It may, but most probably won’t.
So, organisations better allow web teams not to work in the classic ICT project building way. Web teams should have the resources and the liberty to observe and try and test. To change websites in small steps, following intensively what thrives and what doesn’t, weeding away what gets in the way of the purpose. The liberty to root change in observations, in facts, not in opinions.
A website is a living thing.
A website needs constant attention and tender loving care. Observation and testing.
A website is a garden.
Such as Greta’s: