On April 17th 2016 a dozen key oil producers, OPEC members and non-members, will meet in Doha, Qatar to discuss the future of oil prices. The big item on the table is the crude oil production output freeze that has been in and out of news since the beginning of this year and a public stance worth a billion dollars a day.
Falling US Rig counts vindicate the Saudi Strategy. But are rig counts a predictor of US oil production or future oil investments.
News reports indicate that the items on agenda are follow up discussions on the length of the production cap and its implementation in the coming months, primarily between Saudi Arabian and Russian delegates. The other fourteen producers excluding Iran, Libya and Iraq have already indicated a willingness to follow the path set by the two leading producers in the world.
A ramp up in crude oil production in Iraq leading up the Doha oil output freeze meeting.
Ahead of the Doha meeting, here are seven questions for your oil trading playbook for the week starting Monday.
To understand the impact of Doha meeting, you have to understand the context behind the fall in oil prices. The question you have to ask is “Has that context changed?” If the answer is yes, then yes the Doha meeting will change how oil prices behave. If the answer is no, then whatever price changes we see will be driven by perception, not reality. Fundamentals always catch up with air.
The Supply and Demand mix
In the background of Doha output freeze talks, the big item in the news was the fall in US production, the surprise fall in crude stocks and the sharp drop in US rig count figures from a year ago. Two of the three items fed into the “Saudi strategy has worked” conversation but what would be the likely impact on prices. Let’s take a look.
A comparison of crude oil out put change in the US, Iraq and Russia. Data source: EIA, Reuters
First, production losses in the US have been more than offset by the ramp up in production in Iraq, Iran and Russia.
US Oil production changes 2015-2016
While US crude oil production has declined by 600,000 bpd, Iraqi oil production has increased by 750,000 bpd, Russian production had added another 900,000 bpd and Iranian claims indicate that they have or will add another 500,000 bpd. In addition to these increases in supply, the Saudi and Kuwait joint production projects kick started in early 2016 will add another 350,000 bpd to the mix.
So while the reduction in US supply is still a welcome news for oil prices, it has not and will most likely not have an impact on the existing supply glut in the local market. Every barrel that goes offline in North American territories is being replaced by two barrels in the Urals, Siberia and the Middle East. While media coverage and recent price action suggest that the US output drop is significant, in the broader context of crude oil production it is not.
The Demand side
On the demand side, there was finally some positive news on the Chinese front as the chances of a run on the Chinese Yuan decreased with an improvement in capital flows as well as an uptick on the manufacturers’ confidence/purchase index. So a plus one on China. We are not out of the woods yet, but it appears that while China may not help with a demand take off in the immediate term, it may no longer take the global economy and oil prices down with it.
The US economy continues to chug upwards and the Federal Reserve meeting minutes and notes didn’t strike any alarming note other than hints on looking at oil and energy prices as part of the systemic risk equation. Indian demand for crude cargoes remained robust. But European numbers sent mixed signals. Two additional plus signs on the US and Indian front and a not so sure on Europe.
There is an alternate, possibly more credible thesis for the directional change in oil prices than the output freeze talks in Doha. The alternate thesis is the relative price of oil in US dollars. While Iran and Russia may no longer settle their crude export cargoes in USD, the reference price for both Brent and WTI is set in US dollars. Which implies that markets adjust prices due to appreciation or depreciation of the US exchange rate.
EUR-USD exchange rate volatility and returns 2014-2016. Trailing 30 day series.
While the outlook at the beginning of 2016 was that a policy rate change was imminent recent remarks by the Janet Yellen, the Chairperson of the Federal Reserve indicate that the Fed is likely to go slow. Markets and economic environment need some additional breathing room and the Federal Reserve is in an accommodating mood. 2014 and 2015 were great years for the US dollar on the anticipated rate hike but starting off 2016 USD has given some of those gains back. And that weakness directly translates into crude oil price adjustment.
Strong positive correlation between USD exchange rate depreciation and oil price rise on a rolling ten days basis in April 2016.
The switch to positive correlation in the late March, early April price change data set support the idea that post the Doha conversation, we may be looking at a correction in oil prices, given the recovery in the US dollar in the days leading into April. While the alternate thesis is significantly more believable than any impact the Doha oil output freeze talks are likely to have, its ability to predict the direction of oil prices still needs to be tested.
Combined with the absence of negative news coming out of China, Fed’s comments, the weakness of the USD, and the lift in refinery consumption of crude cargoes, it appears that the recovery of oil prices has deeper drivers. Atleast for the next few weeks. To see if these drivers have a permanent impact on oil price outlook, we have to wait for June numbers to come in.
In the interim, enjoy the volatility.